Riferimenti bibliografici
Addis, P. [2021],
Antipaternalismo, disabilità, Costituzione, in «Materiali per
una storia della cultura giuridica», n. 2, pp. 393-409.
Alpa, G. [1993], Status
e capacità. La costruzione giuridica delle differenze individuali,
Roma-Bari, Laterza.
Arstein-Kerslake, A. [2016],
An Empowering Dependency: Exploring Support for the Exercise of Legal
Capacity, in «Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research», vol. 18, n.
1, pp. 77-92.
— [2017], Restoring
Voice to People with Cognitive Disabilities, Cambridge, Cambridge
University Press.
Bach, M. e Espejo Yaksic, N. (a
cura di) [2022], Capacidad jurídica, discapacidad y derechos
humanos, Ciudad de México, Suprema Corte de Justicia de la Nación.
Bach, M. e Kerzner, L. [2010],
A New Paradigm for Protecting Autonomy and the Right to Legal Capacity:
Prepared for the Law Commission of Ontario, https://www.lco-cdo.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/11/disabilities-commissioned-paper-bach-kerzner.pdf.
— [2020], Supported
Decision-making: A Roadmap for Reform in Newfoundland & Labrador: Final
Report, Toronto, Institute for Research and Development on Inclusion and
Society (IRIS).
Barrientos Grandon, J. [2022],
La capacidad jurídica. Una revisión histórica, in M. Bach e N.
Espejo Yaksic (a cura di), Capacidad jurídica, discapacidady derechos
humanos, Ciudad de México, Suprema Corte de Justicia de la Nación, pp.
3-28.
Bernardini, M.G. [2021],
La capacità vulnerabile, Napoli, Jovene.
Caivano, N. [2014],
Conceptualizing Capacity: Interpreting Canada’s Qualified Ratification of
Article 12 of the UN Disability Rights Convention, in «Western Journal of
Legal Studies», vol. 4, n. 1, https://ojs.lib.uwo.ca/index.php/uwojls/article/view/5577/4662.
Carney, T., Shih-Ning, T., Bigby,
C., Wiesel, I., Douglas, J. e Smith, E. [2019], Realising «Will, Preferences
and Rights»: Reconciling Differences on Best Practice Support for
Decision-making?, in «Griffith Law Review», vol. 28, n. 4, pp. 357-379.
Celermajer, D. e Lefebvre, A.
[2020] (a cura di), The Subject of Human Rights, Standford (CA),
Standford University Press.
Cendon, P. [1988] (a cura di),
Un altro diritto per i malati di mente, Napoli, ESI.
Cera, V. e Della Fina, R. [2019],
Valutazione della conformità della normativa italiana all’articolo 12
della Convenzione delle Nazioni Unite sui diritti delle persone con disabilità
(CRPD), Roma, Rapporto dell’Istituto di Studi Giuridici Internazionali
(ISGI) del Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche (CNR).
Christman, J. e Anderson, J. (a
cura di) [2005], Autonomy and the Challenges to Liberalism,
Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
Clough, B. [2017],
Disability and Vulnerability: Challenging the Capacity/Incapacity
Binary, in «Social Policy and Society», vol. 16, n. 3, pp. 469-481.
Consiglio d’Europa [2017],
A Study on the Equal Recognition Before the Law. Contribution Towards the
Council of Europe Strategy on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities,
Galway, 2017.
Constantino Caycho, R.A. e
Bregaglio Lazarte, R.A. [2022], Las salvaguardias para el ejercicio de
capacidad jurídica de personas con discapacidad como una forma de paternalismo
justificado, in M. Bach e N. Espejo Yaksic (a cura di),
Capacidad jurídica,discapacidady derechos humanos, Ciudad de
México, Suprema Corte de Justicia de la Nación, pp. 522-550.
Craigie, J. [2021],
Conceptualising «Undue Influence» in Decision-making Support for People
with Mentale Disabilities, in «Medical Law Review», vol. 29, n. 1, pp.
48-79.
Craigie, J., Bach, M., Gurbai, S.,
Kanter, A., Kim, S.Y.H., Lewis, O. e Graham, M. [2019], Legal Capacity, Mental
Capacity and Supported Decision-making: Report from a Panel Event, in
«International Journal of Law and Psychiatry», n. 62, pp. 160-168.
Dhanda, A. [2006-2007],
Legal Capacity in the Disability Rights Convention: Stranglehold of the
Past or Lodestar for the Future?, in «Syracuse Journal of International
Law & Commerce», n. 34, pp. 429-462.
— [2012], Universal
Legal Capacity as a Universal Human Right, in M. Dudley, D. Silove e F.
Gale (a cura di), Mental Health and Human Rights: Vision, Praxis, and
Courage, Oxford, Oxford University Press, pp. 177-188.
— [2017], Conversations
between the Proponents of the New Paradigm of Legal Capacity, in
«International Journal of Law in Context», vol. 13, n. 1, pp. 87-95.
Donnelly, M., Harding, R. e
Tas¸ciog˘lu, E. [2022], Supporting Legal Capacity in Socio-legal
Context, Oxford, Hart Publishing.
Facchi, A. e Giolo, O. [2020],
Libera scelta e libera condizione, Bologna, Il Mulino.
Falzea, A. [1960],
Capacità (teoria generale), in Enciclopedia del
diritto, VI, Milano, Giuffrè, pp. 34 ss.
Fineman, M.A. [2004],
The Autonomy Myth. A Theory of Dependency, New York, The New
Press.
Flynn, E. e Arstein-Kerslake, A.
[2014], The Support Model of Legal Capacity: Fact, Fiction, or
Fantasy?, in «Berkeley Journal of International Law (BJIL)», vol. 32, n.
1, pp. 124-143.
— [2017], State
Intervention in the Lives of People with Disabilities: The Case for a
Disability-neutral Framework, in «International Journal of Law in
Context», vol. 13, n. 1, pp. 39-57.
Flynn, E., Arstein-Kerslake, A.,
de Bhailis, C. e Serra, M.L. (a cura di) [2020], Global Perspectives on Legal
Capacity Reform: Our Voices, Our Stories, New York, Routledge.
Francis, L. [2021],
Supported Decision-making: The CRPD, Non-discrimination, and Strategies
for Recognizing Persons’ Choices about Their Good, in «The Journal of
Philosophy of Disability», n. 1, pp. 57-77.
Freeman, M.C., Kolappa, K., Caldas
de Almeida, J.M., Kleinman, A., Makhashvili, N., Phakathi, S., Saraceno, B. e
Thornicroft, G. [2015], Reversing Hard Won Victories in the Name of Human
Rights: A Critique of the General Comment on Article 12 of the UN Convention on the
Rights of Persons with Disabilities, in «The Lancet Psychiatry», vol. 2,
n. 9, pp. 844-850.
Glen, K. [2012],
Changing Paradigms: Mental Capacity, Legal Capacity, Guardianship and
Beyond, in «Columbia Human Rights Law Review», n. 44, pp. 93-196.
Gooding, P. [2013],
Supported Decision-making: A Right-based Disability Concept and Its
Implications for Mental Health Law, in «Psychiatry, Psychology and Law»,
vol. 20, n. 3, pp. 431-451.
Guida, G.M. [2019],
L’evoluzione dei criteri generali per l’attribuzione della capacità di
agire, in «Italian Review of Legal History», vol. 5, n. 12, pp. 437-459.
Keeling, A. [2022], The
Problem of Influence. Autonomy, Legal Capacity and the Risk of Theoretical
Incoherence, in M. Donnelly, R. Harding e E. Tas¸ciog˘lu (a cura di),
Supporting Legal Capacity in Sociolegal Context, Oxford, Hart
Publishing, pp. 39-55.
Kohn, N.A. [2021],
Legislating Supported Decision-making, in «Harvard Journal on
Legislation», vol. 58, n. 2, pp. 313-356.
Kong, C. [2017], Mental
Capacity in Relationship: Decision-making, Dialogue, and
Autonomy, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
Lynch, M. e Howlett, E. [2022],
Assisted Decision Making (capacity) (Amendment) Bill 2022 No. 59 of
2022, Social Science, https://data.oireachtas.ie/ie/oireachtas/libraryResearch/2022/2022-06-24_bill-digest-assisted-decision-making-capacity-amendment-bill-2022_en.pdf.
Mackenzie, C. [2014],
Three Dimensions of Autonomy: A Relational Analysis, in A.
Veltman e M. Piper (a cura di), Autonomy, Oppression and Gender,
Oxford, Oxford University Press, pp. 15-41.
Marella, M.R. [1998],
Note critiche in tema di soggettività giuridica e diversità, in
«Politica del diritto», n. 4, pp. 581-599.
— [2020], Antropologia
del soggetto di diritto. Note sulle trasformazioni di una categoria
giuridica, in F. Bilotta e F. Raimondi (a cura di), Il soggetto
di diritto. Storia ed evoluzione di un concetto nel diritto privato,
Napoli, Jovene, pp. 47-76.
Martinez-Pujalte, A. [2019],
Legal Capacity and Supported Decision-making: Lessons from Some Recent
Legal Reforms, in «Laws», vol. 8, n. 4, https://doi.org/10.3390/laws8010004.
Mengoni, L. [1985], La
tutela giuridica della vita materiale nelle varie età dell’uomo, in Id.,
Diritto e valori, Bologna, Il Mulino, pp. 123-145.
Merlo, G. e Tarantino, C. (a cura
di) [2018], La segregazione delle persone con disabilità. I manicomi nascosti
in Italia, Santarcangelo di Romagna, Maggioli.
Minkowitz, T. [2011],
Why Mental Health Law Contravene the CRPD. An Application of Article 14
with Implications for the Obligations of States Parties, p. 15, https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1928600.
Mustaniemi-Laakso, M., Katsui, H.
e Heikkilä, M. [2022], Vulnerability, Disability and Agency: Exploring
Structures for Inclusive Decision-making and Participation in a Responsive
State, in «International Journal for the Semiotics of Law», https://doi.org/10.1007/s11196-022-099.
Naffine, N. [2003], Who
Are Law’s Persons? From Chesire Cats to Responsible Subjects, in «Modern
Law Review», vol. 66, n. 3, pp. 346-367.
Nedelsky, J. [2011],
Law’s Relations. A Relational Theory of Self, Autonomy, and
Law, New York, Oxford University Press.
Opgenhaffen, T. [2022],
The Universal Right to Legal Capacity. Clearing the Haze, in
«Human Rights Law Review», n. 22, pp. 1-14.
Oshana, M. [2020],
Relational Autonomy, in «International Encyclopedia of Ethics»,
https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444367072.wbiee921.
Phillips, J. e Wendler, D.
[2015], Clarifying Substituted Judgement: The Endorsed Life
Approach, in «Journal of Medical Ethics», vol. 51, n. 9, pp. 723-730.
Pizzorusso, A. [1990],
Sull’attuale utilizzabilità delle nozioni di capacità giuridica e di
capacità di agire, in AA.VV., Studi in onore di Paolo
Barile, Padova, CEDAM, pp. 126 ss.
Quinn, G. [2010],
Personhood & Legal Capacity. Perspectives on the Paradigm Shift of
Article 12 CRPD, concept paper.
Saraceno, B. [2021], Un
virus classista. Pandemia, diseguaglianze e istituzioni, Merano,
Alphabeta Verlag.
Savigny, von F.K. [1886-1888],
Sistema del diritto romano attuale, vol. II, traduzione di V.
Scialoja, Torino, UTET.
Series, L. [2022],
Deprivation of Liberty in the Shadows of the Institution,
Bristol, Bristol University Press.
Series, L. e Nilsson, A. [2018],
CRPD: Equal Recognition Before the Law, in I. Bantekas, M.A.
Stein e D. Anastasiou (a cura di), The UN Convention on the Rights of Persons
with Disabilities, Oxford, Oxford University Press, pp. 339-382.
Series, L., Arstein-Kerslake, A.
e Kamundia, E. [2017], Legal Capacity: A Global Analysis of Reform
Trends, in P. Blanck e E. Flynn (a cura di), Routledge Handbook
of Disability Law and Human Rights, London, Routledge, pp. 137-155.
Skowron, P. [2019],
Giving Substance to «the Best Interpretation of Will and
Preferences», in «International Journal of Law and Psychiatry», n. 62,
pp. 125-134.
Stagl, J. e Maragno, G. [2023],
par. 30, Fälle beschränkter Handlungsfähigkeit (infantes, impuberes,
minores, furiosi, prodigi und Personen mit körperlichen Gebrechen), in U.
Babusiaux et al. (a cura di), Handbuch des Römischen
Privatrechts, Berlin, Mohr Siebeck, pp. 268-279.
Stanzione, P. [1988],
Capacità [diritto privato], in Enciclopedia giuridica
Treccani, V, Roma, p. 1 ss.
— [2017], Il soggetto,
II. Capacità, legittimazione, status, in Trattato
Cicu-Messineo, Milano, Giuffrè, pp. 3 ss.
Szmukler, G. [2017],
The UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities: «Rights,
Will and Preferences» in Relation to Mental Health Disabilities, in
«International Journal of Law and Psychiatry», n. 54, pp. 90-97.
Zatti, P. [2003], Oltre
la capacità, in G. Ferrando e G. Visintini, Follia e
diritto, Torino, Bollati Boringhieri, 2003, pp. 49-59.