Mediterranean Economies 2023
DOI: 10.1401/9788815411167/c1
While the EU and the US remain
firm in their opposition to normalization with the Assad regime, and insist on not
providing aid or reconstruction support until Assad engages in political reforms,
the gathering pace of Arab-Syrian normalization will
¶{p. 40}be hard
to reverse and is likely to pick up further steam in 2023, potentially extending to
Turkey, which has recently renewed calls for a direct meeting between Erdogan and
Assad.
The renewed engagements with the
Assad regime can indeed be considered part of broader realignments that have taken
place across the region involving Turkey, Israel, Egypt, the Emirates and Saudi
Arabia. These states had been at loggerheads since the outbreak of the 2011 Arab
uprisings due to Turkey’s (and Qatar’s) support for the Muslim Brotherhood in
various Arab countries while the Gulf States and Israel promoted counter-revolutions
in the region, beginning with Egypt in 2013 [Dessì 2021]. Having launched a hesitant
reconciliation process with the Emirates and Saudi Arabia in 2021, Turkey has
progressed further down the road of rapprochement in 2022, as witnessed by the
exchange of ambassadors with Israel [Al Jazeera 2022g], the multiple high-level
visits with the Emirates [Reuters 2022f] and Saudi Arabia [Reuters 2022f; Al Jazeera
2022a] and the meeting on the sidelines of the Qatar World Cup between Erdogan and
Egyptian President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi in December [Ertan 2022; Jabbour 2022].
Driven by Turkey’s increased isolation and economic troubles at home in the run-up
to elections, this Arab-Turkish-Israeli reconciliation process is positive in terms
of dampening tensions in the Near East. Yet there remain many unknowns and it is too
early to tell if such efforts can be sustained. This is particularly true in light
of the ongoing tensions over Eastern Mediterranean gas and maritime exploration
rights, which have renewed tensions between Turkey and Greece, as well as
disagreements with Egypt over Libya. Here, Ankara signed another controversial gas
exploration deal with the Tripoli government in October, which has significantly
angered the EU, Greece and Egypt [Euractiv and Agence France-Presse 2022]. The
re-election of Benjamin Netanyahu in Israel and the increased violence and
repression carried out by the Israeli army in the occupied Palestinian territories
could also lead to renewed tensions between Tel Aviv and Ankara. President Erdogan’s
traditional support for the Palestinian cause, combined with the new Israeli
government’s provocative actions and rhetoric, particularly vis-à-vis the Muslim
holy sites in occupied East Jerusalem, could well re-ignite the flames of conflict,
with likely reverberations extending to Turkey-Israel relations.
¶{p. 41}
Aside from these broader
developments, Syria’s future perspective appears uncertain. On the positive side,
the ongoing rapprochement with the Arab countries and potentially with Turkey could
help the Syrian economy and alleviate the humanitarian crisis, although there will
be no accountability for crimes committed. On the other, Syria’s close association
with Moscow and Tehran are likely to lead to a continuation of EU and US sanctions
and political isolation, while the future status of Syria’s North-Eastern regions
and the Syrian Kurds remains uncertain.
Developments in this area will
likely depend on the extent of the Turkey-Syria rapprochement, but under most
scenarios the Syrian Kurds do not appear to have a bright future, caught between a
returning Syrian regime, an increasingly militarised Turkish policy and the legacy
of abandonment by the US and its Western allies. Meanwhile, Israel has continued its
military raids in the country to target Iranian or Syrian assets, including the
international airport in Damascus, which was targeted on several occasions during
2022 in an effort to prevent arms deliveries or support for the Lebanese group
Hezbollah.
Whether and to what extent Syria
will be reintegrated into the Arab political context remains to be seen. Considering
ongoing US opposition to any reconstruction of Syria, concrete benefits will likely
take time to materialise. Moreover, the multiple external actors still involved in
Syria – Russia, Iran, the US and Turkey – all have a stake in facilitating or
preventing improvements on the ground and each is ultimately driven by diverging
interests. For this reason, it seems likely that much of the future prospects of
reconciliation and improvements on the ground will not only depend on the Assad
regime or its Arab and Turkish neighbours, but also on the broader contours of
Arab-Iranian-Turkish relations. Should the near future witness a significant
exacerbation of regional and international tensions over Iran, it is likely that
Syria – as well as Lebanon, Yemen, Iraq and possibly Palestine – will be dragged
into the storm, with significant implications for the broader region and EU and US
interests therein.
The example of Iraq is
significant in this regard. Developments over the past year – and especially the
severe political crisis that has evolved since the country’s last elections in
October 2021 – demonstrate the extent of Iranian influence over the country’s
disparate political groups as well as the broader dysfunctions of
¶{p. 42}the Iraqi state and political elites. On several occasions
during the year Iraq took steps towards a return to internal conflict, with the crux
of the crisis revolving around intra-Shia rivalries pitting a group of Iran-aligned
parties against the largest force in the Iraqi parliament led by Muqtadar Al-Sadr
which promotes Iraqi nationalism and independence from both the
US and Iran. Tensions exacerbated after months of political tensions when Al-Sadr
was blocked from forming a majority government after the October vote, leading
ultimately to his unilateral decision to withdraw his parliamentarians in June 2022
[Al Jazeera 2022f]. However, his hopes of attracting greater support failed, as the
vacant parliamentary seats were promptly filled by his political rivals. In
response, Al-Sadr upped the ante further, twice calling on his followers to storm
the heavily fortified diplomatic zone in Baghdad and occupy parliament in July and
August, but again to no avail. Ultimately, by September, it became apparent that
Al-Sadr had grossly miscalculated, effectively sacrificing his political influence
in parliament for little or no gain [Al Jazeera 2022e]. Indeed, after having
recalled his followers from parliament in August, Sadr announced his withdrawal from
politics, leaving his political opponents to form a new government, announced in
late October 2022 and led by Mohammed Shia al-Sudani [The Guardian 2022]. Like Syria
and Lebanon, Iraq remains highly exposed to broader forces in the region, and its
future – including those efforts to promote intra-regional reconciliation and
rapprochement via the convening of the second Baghdad Conference in December 2022 in
Amman – will likely depend on developments surrounding Iran. Should the worst
expectations of a new period of conflict with Tehran materialize internationally and
within the region, Iraq will be sure to suffer as a front-line Arab state whose deep
internal fragilities and fragmentation make it exposed to the meddling of multiple
actors within and beyond the MENA region itself
[13]
. ¶{p. 43}
2. North Africa: Political Stalemates and Authoritarian Reconstitutions
Turning to North Africa, this
section will begin with a brief overview of Tunisia’s ongoing democratic backsliding,
before turning to address the ongoing fragmentation in Libya following the postponement
of national elections originally scheduled for December 2021. A final section will then
assess recent developments in Morocco and Algeria, against the backdrop of ongoing
tensions over Western Sahara.
2.1. Tunisia
Between August 2021 and December
2022, Tunisia’s fragile democracy continued to suffer due to President Kais Saïed’s
consolidation of power and efforts to reduce the independence of parliament and the
judiciary. In August 2021, President Saïed, elected in 2019, extended his unilateral
suspension of parliament indefinitely, thus initiating a real reversal of the
democratic process initiated in 2011 when former President Ben Ali was ousted by
mass protests. The suspension of parliament was followed by the arrest of public
officials and former ministers (especially members of the mildly-Islamist Ennahda
party) on alleged charges of corruption or abuse of power. A month later, in
September 2021, Saïed announced his plan to reform the constitution through a
tightly controlled referendum. The Constitution had been adopted by Tunisia’s
National Constituent Assembly in January 2014 after a two-year-long inclusive and
transparent process and contained strong human rights safeguards. Saïed’s reform
drive was harshly criticised by Tunisia’s powerful labour union, the UGTT, as well
as civil society and political parties throughout the whole of 2022.
Internationally, the United
States urged a swift return to parliamentary democracy in August 2021 while, in an
unprecedented move, G7 ambassadors urged the Tunisian president on 7 September to
quickly appoint a new head of government and return to «constitutional order, in
which an elected parliament plays a significant role». The EU parliament, meanwhile,
passed a resolution calling for the swift return to «full-fledged
democ¶{p. 44}racy», urging Saïed to «engage in an inclusive national
dialogue» on 21 October 2022. Despite mounting international criticism and mass
protests, in July 2022, Tunisia held its controversial constitutional referendum.
The low turnout (officially 30.5 per cent) highlighted the lack of popular support
for the move, even though 94 per cent of voters supported the reform. Once approved,
the new constitution introduced a presidential regime and a bicameral legislative
system, effectively granting President Saiëd unchecked powers, especially over the
judiciary.
Opposition to President Saïed
continued to intensify amid growing concern over human rights abuses. Since August
2021, international NGOs such as Amnesty International have accused security forces
of responding to peaceful protests with arbitrary arrests and the military judiciary
of conducting unfair trials, pointing to an alarming erosion of Tunisia’s human
rights protections in the process. Finally, in December 2022, the presidency
proceeded to push through new legislative elections, amidst the boycott of major
parties. The record-low turnout (8.8 per cent, according to the electoral
authorities [Africa News 2022b]), again underscored the extent of Tunisia’s
democratic backsliding, with numerous calls from the opposition for President Saïed
to step down amidst an increasingly worrying socio-economic crisis in the country.
The Tunisian economy, already severely weakened by a decade of political and
institutional turmoil, has continued to deteriorate due to the combined shocks of
the COVID-19 pandemic followed by the war in Ukraine. The rapid growth of public
debt, combined with high inflation (8.6 per cent) and ongoing shortages of many food
commodities, makes Tunisia’s short to medium future highly uncertain. In light of
such challenges, Tunisia has continued to look to outside financial support. In
mid-December 2022, the European Investment Bank approved a €220m loan including
€150m in emergency food support while on 1 December, Algeria pledged a $200m
low-interest loan and $100m financial assistance to Tunisia. On 15 October, Tunisia
also reached a further 48-month long agreement with the IMF for $1.9 billion to
support the country’s struggling economic policies [International Monetary Fund
2022a].
¶{p. 45}
Note
[13] On Iraq see: Higel [2022]; Fantappie [2022].