Salvatore Capasso, Giovanni Canitano (a cura di)
Mediterranean Economies 2023
DOI: 10.1401/9788815411167/c5
Moreover, food security at the country (macro) level does not automatically imply food security at the household (micro) level. Access to food by households across countries with different income levels is largely determined by physical and socio-economic conditions, and while countries can be food secure, households may not [FAO 2015; Barlow et al. 2020]. For smallholder farmers,
{p. 146}for example, focusing on cash crops limits the allocation of the available land to the production of subsistence vegetables and key staple foods, increasing their dependency on local market conditions [Hashmiu, Agbenyega and Dawoe 2022]. Access to food may also be challenging for households that lose from trade liberalization, such as smallholders along the food value chain who were previously protected and -unable to withstand the competition- see their incomes decline after trade liberalization; or households whose incomes are generated in non-competitive sectors; or those whose incomes are too volatile to bear local and global food price fluctuations. Drawing on a global analysis of microdata spanning 132 countries in the 2014-2017, Barlow et al. [2020] found that, in low-income countries, poorer households were more likely to be food insecure despite liberal trade policies. Persistent structural challenges, including labour market rigidities and poor infrastructure (among others) tend to undermine the effects of liberalization. Moreover, the increased availability of- and access to food may not always be positive from a utilization point of view. Thus, food security at the macro-level does not necessarily ensure the quality and nutritious content of food, but, to the contrary, may lead to unhealthy changes in diets and insufficient intake of micronutrients because of the affordability of alternative unhealthy food options.
Therefore, food-related trade policies should be accompanied by a coherent set of domestic policies that ensure equal access to food and adequate nutrition in disadvantaged regions and households, such as reducing food import tariffs, income transfer, and/or targeted food subsidies. Long term policy solutions are also required to tackle structural issues affecting food security. These are different from short term policy responses that are designed to address short-run food spikes [Kerr 2012].
In countries where rural poverty is widespread, engaging smallholders in international trade and facilitating their access to global markets is crucial. At the country level, empowering smallholder farmers by improving their access to information, to inputs, and to finance is necessary to increase their productivity. Clustering in farm associations and cooperatives has also increased smallholder farmers’ participation in global markets [Matthews 2014]. International cooperation in agriculture can also improve food security in several ways. For example, Official {p. 147}Development Assistance through Aid-for-Trade targeting agriculture has proven efficient in improving productive capacities in the agricultural sector. International organizations often carry out micro-level interventions to make agricultural value chains more inclusive, for example by fund training programs for farmers or developing special initiatives to empower women working in agriculture [4]
. An increasing number of multinationals is also using the fair-trade certification system to shorten the value chain and work directly with smallholder farmers, which helps them capture a larger share of the price and increase their income. At the supranational level, however, the global framework governing international trade in agriculture must provide more attention to food security and inclusive trade. With increasing standards, a decreasing share of smallholders are engaged in global trade [Maertens and Swinnen 2014], whereas multinational firms – being more capable of overcoming these barriers – increasingly dominate agricultural production and trade.

2. Food security in the MENA region: what is at stake?

Since the 1970, the MENA region is a net importer of food including essential grains and meat. On average, while food imports decreased from 19.4 per cent in 1975 of merchandise imports to 11.3 per cent in 2021, its exports significantly decreased from 7.3 per cent to 3.6 per cent over the same period, making this region a net importer. This makes it one of the most exposed and potentially volatile regions to developments in the global food markets.
Since the region has limited potential to increase its food production due to limited water resources and arable lands, its food security will increasingly depend on imports. Figure 1 depicts the food security outlook at the global level. The map shows that MENA countries are among those countries with a moderate risk and stable conditions from a food security perspective. Except for Egypt and Libya, the rest of the MENA region {p. 148}(including Morocco, Tunisia, Algeria, Jordan, Palestine to, Syria, and Lebanon) witness significant rainfall or vegetation deficit. The food security outlook for Syria and Yemen, both suffering from over a decade of internal political (armed) conflict, is classified as highly risky.
Fig.1. Food Security Outlook (2022).
Source: Hunger Map, World Food Program.
Figure 2 compares food security indicators across MENA countries. Overall, recent FAO estimates suggest that around 32 per cent of the region’s citizens lack access to sufficient and nutritious food [Keulertz and Byiringiro 2022]. While political and/or armed conflicts have severe repercussions on the high prevalence of food insecurity (40 per cent or higher) in Djibouti and Libya, and economic sanctions are likely to take a heavy toll on food security in Iran, high prevalence of moderate and severe food insecurity is also found in relatively politically stable countries, such as Jordan. In the latter, conflicts in neighboring countries and the resulting influx of refugees from Syria added to the pre-existing pressure on food supply. At the same time, Jordan has little potential for agricultural expansion due to limited water availability. In fact, water availability in Jordan is among the lowest in the world, partly due to the transboundary water challenges that involve Israel, Syria, and Lebanon around the Hasbani River and Lake Tiberias [Christoforidou et al. 2022]. Egypt is also likely to face water challenges due to the construction of the Grand Ethiopian Renaissance Dam and in the absence of significant enhancements in sustainable water supply and agricultural expansion (ibid). The prevalence of moderate to severe food insecurity affects nearly one third of the population in Morocco, Tunisia, and Lebanon. The Maghreb region has been witnessing drought and above-average weather temperatures [Mandour 2021], leading to decreasing vegetation. As oil-poor countries, their export revenues are also unlikely to secure sustainable food imports. As for Lebanon, the economy has been suffering from longstanding challenges related to political instability, chronic internal and external deficits, high import dependence, and the concentration of Palestinian and Syrian refugees in the Eastern and Southern parts of the country. Recent shocks including the pandemic and the Beirut Port explosion pushed the country towards a financial and economic collapse, leading to skyrocketing food prices and endangering the livelihood of an increasing proportion of the population.{p. 150}
Fig. 2. Food security indices in the MENA region – by country (2020).
Note: The prevalence of food security is percentage of people in the population who live in households classified as moderately or severely food insecure. A household is classified as moderately or severely food insecure when at least one adult in the household has reported to have been exposed, at times during the year, to low quality diets and might have been forced to also reduce the quantity of food they would normally eat because of a lack of money or other resources.
Source: World Development Indicators online dataset.
Source: World Development Indicators online dataset.
Figure 3 depicts the share of trade in food in total merchandise trade in selected MENA economies. On the exports side, Morocco has the highest share of food exports in total merchandise exports (23.1 per cent), followed by Palestine (21.2 per cent), Lebanon (19.6 per cent), and Egypt (18.1 per cent). Despite the high prevalence of food insecurity in these countries, the share of food exports in total merchandise exports is higher than the same average in low-and middle-income countries (10.4 per cent), and the share of the MENA region altogether (3.8 per cent). These exports are mainly exports of fruits and vegetables [Keulertz and Byiringiro 2022]. In contrast to these south Mediterranean economies, higher income countries in the region such as Israel, Saudi Arabia, and other Gulf countries have negligible shares of total merchandise exports that are concentrated in food exports.
{p. 151}
Note
[4] The International Trade Centre, for example, has launched the «SheTrades Initiative» to improve women’s livelihood in export-oriented value chains. For more details, see https://intracen.org/media/file/11681.